Saturday 26 May 2012

Final averages

As explained, selecting the assignments to take into account was based on criteria that would benefit MOST students. This was no special privileges or considerations would be given to any one. As a result, some people could not pass the course, but the same would have been true had it be done differently, and to many more people.

60% corresponds to:

-The first and second assignments were counted on the mere submission with 100% (when both were submitted). Still, few did not present them and they got a zero.
The third was not counted (hierarchy) because 80% of the group failed it with 0.
-The grade on the debate (adjusted according to my own notes and your comments on the survey). I you had a better grade on the quiz, this last was not changed.
-the combined grade of the mindmap/presentation, and the individual research that followed (most people chose to describe the forms of business organisations in their country). Late submissions do not count! These two are also averaged to your convenience.

40% corresponds to the final paper.

This list will be updated shortly, please check later if your ID does not appear below. For details, write an email or contact me via Skype on Monday.

107479= 5% (0)
107970= 68% (2)
107472= 60% (1)
113554= 71% (3)
107538= 51% (1)
120121= MI
105934= 47% (0)
120131= MI
108001= MI
105974= 48% (0)
096444= 86% (4)
110346= 42% (0)
108541= 92% (5)
107467= MI
107532= 56% (1)
107477= 82% (4)
113579= 71% (3)
105897= 57% (1)
105989= 48% (0)
080553= 56% (1)
105977= 66% (2)
105893= 48% (0)
105933= 74% (3)
120264= MI
105978= 57% (1)
105975= 57% (1)
120173= MI
096448= 63% (2)
107803= 46% (0)
105932= 54% (1)
107480= 75% (3)
105899= 70% (2)
107528= 52% (1)
107539= 49% (0)
105942= 53% (1)
107468= 74% (3)
120152= 63% (2)
120133= 60% (1)
110347= 48% (0)
107541= 71% (3)
096485= 72% (3)
105705= 56% (1)
105906= 56% (1)
105984= 61% (2)
105787= 62% (2)
095983= MI
YY= 37% (0)
096488= 78% (3)
107530= 78% (3)

No comments:

Post a Comment